Tuesday, January 3, 2012

OBJECTUM SEXUALITY- THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY

Objectum Sexuality is an attraction to objects where the person becomes intimate and in most cases sexual with them.  Most objectum sexuals also believe in animism which is the belief that an object possesses a personal life or soul.  Most objectum sexuals feel that love is reciprocal where an object can return love and communicate, thus a mutual relationship.  A true objectum sexual is definitely 100% off limits to ever having a relationship with another human being.  Most objectum sexuals are polyamorous.  But, objectum sexuality is almost always among those who have Asperger’s Syndrome, Autism or other mental issues that range from mild to severe. 
Polyamory (from Greek πολύ [poly, meaning many or several] and Latin amor [love]) is the practice, desire, or acceptance of having more than one intimate relationship at a time with the knowledge and consent of everyone involved. It is not to be confused with polysexuality, which is attraction towards multiple genders and/or sexes. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyamory )

Pseudo-Objectum Sexual: A person claiming to be objectum sexual, who is married to a human partner and is only interested in the object with no intimacy for it or make it secondary.   A person claiming to be objectum sexual, who is in a relationship with a human or have no problems with human relationships.  A person claiming to be objectum sexual, that use an object as a means to an end to a human relationship ( Read about Sexual Fetishism on  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_sexuality ).
NOTE: Objectum sexuals who have had relationships in the past, whether married, had children or not, but did not feel right about their human relationships because they were always attracted to objects only, should not be considered Pseudo-Objectum Sexuals.   These objectum sexuals just could not fit into the so called normal world and should not have to be forced to change the very orientation they were born with because of peer pressure only bringing extreme depression and a life of misery.     

Objectum stalker:  These objectum sexuals are a menace to society because they stalk their love objects though they have been told “no” numerous times by the objects’ owners.  These objectum sexuals are so desperate to have the objects that they curse the owners and threaten lawsuits on the grounds they are autistic, bipolar or some other mental issue.  These objectum sexuals don’t seem to have the mentality to know that they are causing damage to these businesses that own the objects of their obsessions forcing them to take drastic measures on the Internet and other places.  This kind of objectum sexuals is very disturbing and irrational.
LAST THOUGHTS:  Many objectum sexuals have serious mental issues and it doesn’t matter if they are intelligent, talented or just downright uneducated with absolutely no talent.  So I decided to repost this with revisions, since I have completely dissociated myself with OSI and deactivated OSers Only. 

I can feel a weight lifted off my shoulders because of all of the lunacy that is going on amongst these people.  I just couldn’t see eye to eye with OSI’s leader because she condones stalking making an excuse that this person has special issues, so she can be justified in destroying or trying to destroy a person’s business and bad behavior on the part of some other OSI’s members. 

I have already gone back to the way things were before I joined this group.  The longer that I was around these people the more issues I had myself.  And I stick with what I say in the above paragraphs.  Call me narrow-minded, I don’t care because I know that is what the leader meant.  

So, my question is why anyone claiming to be separate from his own kind, be even associate with a group where lunacy runs amok.    That is a person that has not proven to me that he is OS, so it makes no sense at all making a bunch of stupid You Tube videos and why he is wasting his time on this bunch.  Is it because he is just as loony  too?       

 Alice Ford-John, revised 1/3/2012